The
Transcendental Ewer
For
Dirty, Little Secrets
And
Misery?
A Creative Commentary
By
David A. Archer
02/15/1968
09/22/2006
Funny how a person is lead to associate it with happiness and success.
Obviously and readily observable, such isn't the case beyond those few short moments of feigned ignorance as per the designs of some staged happenstance glance toward a preference in the store window. And of course, those few moments of adoration following the ceremony. Then, it would seem that everything kind of goes "down hill" as they say.
After those few moments of pleasure have passed, and the excitement of procuring it has gone…. It always seems that it then becomes the object of focus during the most troublesome of times for the bearer, as it sits poised and glimmering on the dainty finger which at one point was so eager to present it to the rest of the world.
It must even become the place where dirty little secrets go as they develop in the violation of agreements which accompanied it having been presented. If for nothing more than the fact that it usually is the most common point of attention and focus when considering both the levity of such violations before hand… and then in the vast array of such thoughts after they have transpired.
If a person considered it, especially given the large percentage amount of such agreements which then end in the dissolved state of such agreements. It could be said that such sparkling and sought after adornments are set forward to serve only as a place to focus indecisions, misery and of course, to house dirty little secrets.
I am not saying that this is right or wrong. It is obvious that we all seem to think that they deserve them. Perhaps to the point where they may deserve them both… the object of desire in stature, and of course the reasons for then putting it to some use in housing such secretive behavior.
As per society and modern social movement, it is even expected to some degree. I have personally heard many people jest about the progression itself.
Why then not simply address it as per said consistencies and remove those loathsome points in life?
I personally can't understand the want to torture ones self with such points of agony. But again, I have never experienced such moments for myself beyond removed observation. For all that I know, such might very well be the designed usage of such magnificent adornments… which admittedly, if I could personally afford, I might very well be inclined to such gift in good faith as well… even knowing the actual facts pertaining to said social consistencies.
I might be inclined, in the proper situation, to actually include in the good faith agreement, the presence of a chosen aspect for which to populate the area of dirty little secret. But of course, in all reality such would only be in the instance of large amount of monetary wealth.... given that such is usually the inspiration for interlopers to impose such temptations anyhow.
What else is there to do really in those situations? You can't kill the individual with the personal want to impose themselves into someone else's happiness. It is seen as a violation of both their decision making freedoms and those of the particular female in question possessing the transcendental ewer for such malignant behavior and self doubt.
This then means that the institution of such agreements is in no way an actual priority within society… which obviously makes for fewer options in regard to such agreements.
The modern type of such agreements are in no way what they are postured as. In all simplicity, they are nothing more than a liability which somehow still clings to the old associations of meaning… including some suggested social status of having made the grade in regard to procreation and some fictitious selection process.
All it really means in the modern day, is that you perhaps have made the grade to someday remit a monthly payment to a person having utilized the special adornment for what it seems to be intended for.. and of course, their chosen and former dirty little secret.
Of course, none of that has to be in such a manner…but that would depend entirely upon forsaking the optimum usage for such an adornment… and as we all know, it holds far more importance than being easily left without fulfilling its seemingly designed usages.
Admittedly, the thought of experiencing that slight moment of pretension in such an exchange, would be something to experience I suppose.. even though it is seen more as a status statement than anything else.
I simply would be of the mind to prepare for the seemingly inevitable. In my opinion to some degree, it should be a package deal given there aren't many other options.
The "dirty little secret" should be a part of the initial purchase process…including the aspect of having the choice of such dirty little secret in regard to preference. It would just make things easier.
"Here...dear" I can see the conversation beginning, "here is the transcendental ewer for dirty little secrets you wanted…. And after the reception, we can go meet the dirty little secret you opted for in the package."
Wouldn't that be so much easier than some mental anguish associated with the sea saw of confusion and emotional strife which usually accompanies such actions in all stages of it? From the initial decision through what ever justifications… all the way to the sad moments of disclosure and finally the "rebirth" in jubilation of having been awarded some allowance as per deservedness?
Sure, people change their mind….but such is part of my point in this commentary. Why not allot for such a change of mind to make the entire experience, however long it may last, much more enjoyable for the parties concerned?
Love? A person may ask. What about the love aspect? Simple. If a person truly "loves" their “dirty little secret ewer” partner… then, in that is truly the answer to such tolerances… or at least so goes the justifications.
Sure the flip side of the coin is just as "bad"… for years men have had mistresses…but even in that, in regard to the focal point in subject here… that transcendental ewer again and still served and serves very similar purposes as being the focal point of miserable thoughts and emotions.
I hope I never have to step into one of those things! I am sure they are filled with the most undesirable emotional content the human species can produce.
Especially if it is a sort of accrued thing over time.
The fact is, is that there are several variations of possible developments in and around any given example of such agreement.
None of that matters in regard to what I am examining here.. which again, is the presence and point of focus that something meant to remind a person of good things, becomes.
People make choices early on in life which they may find aren't their desires down the road. Regardless of the reasons things change, they do. Regardless of the reasons initial decisions were made as per such commitment, they were – in those situations.
But regardless of all within such combinations and possibilities, the fact remains. Never has there been another point of focus which has received so much attention within such agreements as is the transcendental ewer for dirty little secrets and misery.
Strange to think that such a symbol, with so many potentials is most commonly used as an anchor to the past as apposed to the celebration of now, and the future. Odd how it seems to become a reminder of what was, instead of what still is to be. An imposed limitation replacing the promise and fulfillment of liberation.
I would want mine to suggest what still may be to come. But first I'll have to figure out how to set it to such a purpose... if it can be done that is.
Could it be much more different than setting a watch? Wind it here… roll it there…listen momentarily for indications of success in such alignments. Of course, all before presenting it in said good faith.
They do tend to sparkle a bit more than a time piece…but maybe that doesn't necessarily indicate a deeper complication in usage beyond, that is, personal perception.
Maybe I could set mine to simply reject any such forms and attempts of placement and focus pertaining to misery and indecision?
Maybe I simply won't bother with them in the least… which of course means that I am immediately lower on the percentage scale of finding a situation where one may be needed to begin with.
I personally am comfortable with that.
If I want complications, I'll just double park.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home