Behold!

BEHOLD!
A Sign?

I can think of very few ways to state this... so it is that bold and direct is probably most in order.

I don't feel that Jesus is a necessity any more.

I say this based on much thought and consideration and in no way in a stance that could be held as some argument for those involved in the 'creation/evolution' pong crap.

In fact... if I had to outright state an opinion on this statement myself, I might say that such is based partly on the observable fact within human development, that Christianity is largely victorious regarding much of what it is observably set out to be... and then further that there must not be any human transgressions that are beyond forgiveness in our day and age.

What could anyone possibly do now, that could be seen as an unforgivable sin? Dressed in all of the promises of devotion.

This does lend much to ponder considering Christendom.

Where does it go from here? It is/was already considerably victorious concerning human development... even when considering the repeated attempts to thwart it with ecclesiastic bents.

Simply as a human consideration. A consideration outside of political bias and/or motivation. Christianity has triumphed in many respects....

...this being (if nothing more than), the successful saturation of an (variations through human mutation) ideological structure - as obviously was the design (and much more in my opinion).

An arguable aspect of such 'design' seems to have very much been in the interest of a judgment in the manner of perpetuation +/-.

This meaning, that with the saturation of the ideology/theology to a satisfactory degree.... the rapture.... Armageddon, with the second coming of Christ, could/can never transpire.

This being in the reason that the Christ figure ( perfect figure and 'son of god'), could never be reincarnated as a 'perfect being' within those constraints... since, as is evident - self adulation, self worship - is far from being considered within perfection.

Further then in such considerations... if it were that something such as Christ were to make a return in our(or any other day and age saturated with Christianity) day and age to successfully fulfill such area of measure... it would then be in the only area(s) of civilization which are not effected/exposed to/with the Christian ideology.

For alot of reasons... many of which having to do with some very brilliant minds of centuries past.... that just ain't gonna happen these days. Most especially considering the idea and actuation of commerce as is now dominant..... but that is another study in and of itself.

What it seems to mean within this context and as I have addressed in studies... is very much, that through what is recognized as the 'power' of Christ as it has been set forth... and as has been so brilliantly portrayed in many instances......... We hold the majority of control concerning human fate within our own decision making and developmental capacities.... and righteously so from certain considerations as is/are the unbiased consideration of greater efficiencies.

For instance concerning the 'Nazi' Pope.... God isn't going to come and tell him he is a naughty boy... but, within our human failings from certain perspectives..... we somehow have managed to again digress of and within such empowerment....

Yes, such is from a personal point of view when considering larger social motions and previous potentials... but such still stands and is arguable. The extremes of influence from failed directions, again being imparted within an obvious sociological digression... is probably not the path of greater potentials concerning our charge of mentoring human development in and of the freedoms created concerning said triumphs. Especially when the priorities of such are based on deficient reason.

Some people would say that such indicates the defeat of the ideology itself.... but again, I stand on the reasoning that such 'triumph' as is observable pertaining to Christianity, only then indicates the heightened responsibility AND the magnified potentials of human existence.

Such is to say... the 'Nazi's' aren't victorious in proving something with the use of such an example as 'Pope' in such context.... they just maybe know that the Big J.C. ain't comin' t' supper' any time too soon.

Unfortunately, in my opinion..... such a digression in want to perhaps impose previous failed directions... only has actually imposed an impedance.

But that would again stand as proofs to the inferior aspect of much of what was actually defeated. Especially concerning the use of said theological potentials.


Just change the idea chimp.