Humans As Sexual Creatures?
A Creative Commentary
By
David A. Archer
02/15/1968
11/06/2006
I think it is an illusion now that I look at it more closely. An illusion we have lost ourselves in, as with much else - even losing the more finer points of the relationship itself.
We are the only creature (save a few primitive primates that may have been taught such) to engage in sex for pleasure, but that doesn't convince me of anything in regard to our existence being primarily fueled with sex.
If you consider it, the subject of sex is as much or more of a hassle than anything. Esspecially given the meat headed use of our cognitive ability from the direction of certain types of people bent on making it dis pleasurable for what ever envious reasons.
This of course being directed at others, and never themselves.
It could be said that there is a considerable amount of the population that puts more time into ruining such aspects of existence for others, as they put into their own lives. But that isn't the subject matter of this thought.
The subject matter of this, is more toward the relationship between men and women. The apparent and promoted aspect of some natural inclination toward intercourse - even in the male/female emulations so common in same sex relationships... and further that it is some point of pleasure to be experienced in life, at will.
When you consider it, there could hardly be a more lop-sided point of focus from either perspective. The co-existing parts are not conducive to the idea of achieving sexual contentment from either point of view. This isn't to be seen as anyones fault necessarily, especially within this commentary - it is only a very obvious fact, especially after the act of child birth.
Honestly, as is widely promoted in modern society, to actually fulfill the sexual urges of a female to the point of contentment, a person would have to possess an arm sized appendage... which of course, then instills a fear of sort in the counterpart to that necessity. To fulfill the sexual urges of the male, would require something to the tune of harems.
...which then poses yet another impasse in the area of human sexual relations.
In all of that which could be examined time and again, it all boils down to one fact. Sex isn't necessarily meant as some point of human focus and constant interaction.
It is over rated in that respect.
Then why the focus on it in so many ways. So frequently?
This then brings other questions such as the fact as pointed out, in the necessity of such intimidating "members," that humans aren't really responding to the idea of evolution either.... at least in the respect that evolution is touted and more directly around the ideas that somehow a pronounced want or need of some physical aspect then develops because of said want or need.
It doesn't happen as can be demonstrated in the consistent size and presence percentage wise, of the more common sized penis for instance.
To know that inherently the match up between men and women is quite uneven in needs to facilitate pleasure entirely- and then further to know that the most common sized appendages within our physical progress remain far below those incredibly huge physiques (comparably), is very much to know that such interactions aren't what they are promoted as....
If those things were true about the "inspired" and "influenced" development of physical aspects within creatures because of some survival need... wouldn't the standard and common size of the human penis have gotten larger over time? Perhaps the flexibility and resilience of the vagina would have progressed?
That is, again, if it were that such activities were somehow what we have made them out to be as important beyond the more rudimentary aspects.
I know it sounds like I could be simply off key here, but consider some things the next time you happen past a "toy shop" window.
Those plastic representations of human attributes aren't that HUGE because someone thinks that it is funny.
There is a definite want there for what ever reasons that are not the subject matter here in.
Those manufactured representations of human "tools," are very much evidence themselves of the imbalance I am speaking of in regard to the idea of sexual penetration and interaction as "pleasure."
It might just be a physiological mutation that we as a creature do not recognize as such because of our contained perspectives. It might just be an indicator that "human development" was/is really, nothing more than the progress of diversion away from the major consistencies of normality within all other living creatures.
From a perspective of examining the popular ideologies pertaining to our reality being a "heaven" or "hell," in light of such possible mutations and of course that grotesque imbalance of compatibility concerning that "pleasure," it would then seem to be more along the lines of a "hell" of some sort.
What else could it be knowing those very simple and basic facts?
It isn't possible to sexual please someone to the point of honest contentment. That contented aspect usually arises after all of the youthful vigor has faded. After there seems to be no other options even. Then it is simply a contentment of sorts, and not really a sexual contentment.
This fact, in my opinion, then gave rise to the necessary aspects of distraction from that point of hellish concentration - that puzzle with no answer, so to speak, other than the fact that perceiving it as a standard is insane... but common and wanted all the same.
Everything else we have could be said to have been derived from and as for the purpose of distraction in "settling the difference" between that want of contented pleasure and the very real fact that it is elusive if existent at all.
I personally have been equipped with an average length, being between six and six and 1/2 inch's length, depending upon my diet and current weight, and quite a healthy girth if I do say so.
I personally feel that this is hieght/wieght proportionate, which I also feel is quite common.
I have had some success in the direction of bringing pleasured states of existence momentarily to females... that is to say, climax of a partner is no real stranger even in the few partners I have had.... but never would I imagine it to be capable of bringing entire contentment. Especially not in "one felled swoop" so to speak. The fantasy of riding some female into exhaustion and thus, contentment in one "go" just isn't a truthful thing - and I do not see where it can even be expected... unless of course again, a person possesses some monstrosity that would be more for fear than anything else.
To do so in an evenings various interactions, is entirely a different story, including facets which are fast moving away from the common aspect of human interaction - including conversation.
This then compares and couples the idea of sexual pleasure and satisfaction with the idea of fear and pain. If it is that sexual intercourse is supposed to yield that which is most widely held to be true, then it is that such a psychological relationship exists between fear, pain and that supposed satisfaction "instantly" so to speak.
I do think it to be a distraction of sorts. A distraction which has been turned into a rather precarious point of focus... which yields nothing much more than anguish for many, for the most part.
It just stands to no reason that our existence is set out to be filled with such as a main point in focus. Consider the impossibility of such designs and what that would then mean if it were that sexual pleasure-contentment (being impossibility) were actually the reason for existence?
This then poses only a few options within that subject matter and very much explains many of the developed leanings toward one sided aspects of such interactions on both sides of the interest itself.
Further then it suggests that something is derived differently for and from either side of such concerns. Meaning that the male gets something entirely different than does the female, from such interactions.
But that as well, may be nothing more than a developed perception. Something derived out of said mutated psyche from which to find at least some form of reprieve from the apparent drive toward such activities. An "invented" prize so to speak in some effort to justify the near insane aspects of considering the want, much less the action as some point of focus in human existence.
The incompatibility itself, truly leads me to believe that it might just be some huge joke being played on humanity.
Sure, there are great "match ups" but usually those entail some similar form of over pronounced hieght/wieght differences...
...then of course, are the innumerable differences in personal preferences, which then adds yet another layer of confusion to that area of discontent. Perpetual, fueled and driven, discontent which we somehow continue to tell ourselves is not only some goal for the purpose of pleasure, but as well some form of standard and measure to be attained.
We as creatures have built an entire value system of something as fictitious as is the want of sexual fulfillment, but thank goodness it isn't a value system that actually has any thing to do with anything else beyond the spectrum of confusion within inter-gender relationships.