PERSONAL THOUGHTS
ON
LOVE AND EMOTION
Contemplation Oration Part I
A
Creative Commentary
By
David A. Archer
02/15/1968
10/19/2006
Incredibly vast subject and one that is just as difficult to begin.
A person might start with the aspects of modern society and the progression of emotional recognitions as a person ages within said society... but that is like starting somewhere in the middle.
Come to think of it, starting anywhere is really like starting somewhere in the middle in regard to the subject of human emotion.
I suppose the "somewhere in the middle" I will begin this oration at, is somewhere near the ever popular idea of "Love," in the many ways it can manifest.
Love can and is recognized in our society as various levels of different sorts of want, I suppose.. while really, the idea of "love" from my personal opinion has very little to do with "want" in the regard that it is most widely associated with.
In an extreme sense, the idea of "love" can even encompass mercy killing. Which of course isn't altogether too recognized in the modern understanding of it. "Mercy killing" meaning areas and situations within a given example society that death would be better than seeing someone you "love" be subject to.
Of course, within our safe society and modernism's, there aren't many situations like that which can come to be... but I do imagine that there are still those instances, such as within large power circles, where such can find some way of being.
It sounds harsh, but consider for a moment... just on the outside chance that someone you actually loved was placed in a situation that would be nothing more than an unbearable hell? Some situation that may mandate their existence into a form which no animal on the planet would have to endure?
Wouldn't it be "love" to keep that person(s) from having to experience that sustained and very horrific atmosphere?
There are fates worse than death, any person with any real smarts, must admit.
Isn't it "love" to prevent such hellish existence and experience?
Is it "love" to intercede in their personal decisions rendering such a hell possible?
Quite the paradox in extreme example. ~
Again addressing the idea from somewhere nearer our safe existences and far from such extremes, it is as stated quite common to perceive just about any slight emotional shift as at least the beginnings of "love."
Lust in most cases is even promoted as "love" in an effort to gain that wonderful prize, and enable the co-participant with adequate excuses after the "prize" having excursion is over.
No where near even the television versions of "love," but none the less employed to such degrees quite commonly.
Affinities are often seen as "love." Affinities for just about anything these days. But again, no where near actual "love" in the sense of human interaction.
Crushes are often times relegated to such category as "love," but most times crushes are accompanied by a one sided aspect, and many times involve loads of insecure emotional games which of course, contrary to popular belief... really don't fall within the scope of the sort of things a person would want of "love" much less "do" to someone that they claimed to "love." Constantly implying some impending doom, being one of them.
When you really think about it, and especially considering the modern atmosphere of society.. it makes a person wonder if there is even such a thing as "love" in our modern human exchanges. Is it just fiction we perceive in various forms? A mythical paradise which we hope to construct ourselves some way?
It seems as though it would almost even be more possible in our modern day that there is no such thing, than the dreamy want of it to exist. This within the facts all too present in human interactions... deceptions being one of them.
is it "love" to bring emotional harm to one's object of "love" through failing in certain deceptions?
Is it "love" if said deceptions are seen as necessary? Is it then simply a compromise of various wants?
When exploring deceptions though, a person must consider that they have always existed, as with many other aspects of our perception of "love" which do not any where near fit our description or want of the meaning of it.
We lie to ourselves and choose to do so in the interest of convincing ourselves of the presence of such a mythical thing as is "love" in that most common understanding.
It is there, but never as is expected and never in whole as it is imagined it would seem.
Attached to this idea of "love" then, is many other truly deranged emotional possibilities... unless of course you happen to be mentally dead.
It is simply in and of the nature of that idea called "love."
Again, as some sick joke on ourselves we set ourselves up through the conditioning introduced to society, to have to chance the gambit of various illusions and toils we as a species have invented for ourselves. This in the effort of experiencing that illusive concept we all have a standard for, called "love."
Personally, I have found the best successes in relationships not through "love" as it is widely understood, but through a sort of friendship that is just as rare if not extinct in the modern climate of social and class warfare that we call society.
I have had relationships begun with sexual experiences, having of course the intention of certain developments which never transpired.
I have had relationships begun with silly, adolescent jitters and sad, clumsy attempts at courtship... again with the hopes of something developing.. which I have come to find, is really nothing more than the expectations within a sound friendship. Most times then being displaced by those silly (though admittedly enjoyable at times) jitters and frustrations in wanting it all to be "just right" so to speak.
A friendship which acts as a base value to house and weather those moments of innate human insanity called emotion. Familiarity enough to satisfy those strange and creeping thoughts which suggest some mis-step and seat suspicion where communication should reside. Familiarity in a scarce enough degree so as not to steal the wonder in the experience of finding it.
It is so incredibly amazing to me, given all of the promoted want of stable relationships... that so few ever actually enter into any new experience without some lofty expectations which always serve to disappoint. As if there is some goal... some "finish line" which serves to certify a genuine relationship has begun... of course being reinforced with the sort of things mentioned being instabilities... unnecessary instabilities that we heap upon ourselves.
The want for something to be perfect... as we may have imagined it, then acting to overshadow and most times ruin the incredibly cool potentials without the pomp and silliness of societies conditioned ideology of said "love."
Familiarity breeds contempt. Doing so only if it is that such is made a possibility. But achieving, more so establishing a sort of familiarity as a relationship progresses without the silly dramatic needs implied, can and is a very valuable thing.
How then does anyone establish such levels of trust through familiarity within our vast expanse of society?
Then of course is the aspect of "other" partners.
Is it "love" to deny this potential "need" of a partner you are said to "love?"
Is it really "love" if it is they find that need for other companionship?
Is it "love" to remain purposefully distant from potential successes within that idea and relationship?
So again with the peripheral insanities which accompany our idea of "love."
They all seem to extend from presumption, expectations... and more so such without communication... which then suggests that there is no familiarity in which to communicate adequately. As if communication could potentially harm the mythical idea a person or persons holds as the idea of "love."
This of course, as per the understood and optimum idea of "love," is not actually "love." Which essentially means that if it were that we had such a relationship, the optimum levels of familiarity which would insure stability.. I could potentially just call you a dirty b*tch f*cking w*ore one day out of the blue and within the idea of actual love, it would be alright. Knowing of course that it were honest communication. As well with the example inverted. This without even a second thought concerning the possibility of losing that which is supposedly valued about the relationship.
This isn't to say that I personally would do something like that.. especially out of the blue, but in honestly examining the idea of "love" it should be possible. Further I personally wouldn't be inclined to such forms of communication in a common manner, not because of "love" as much as in the interest of basic civility.
Funny how people aren't ready to accept those aspects within the idea of relationship and love. In fact many people don't even consider it in their topical and limited version of the idea of love.
There are those that see the idea itself as more like the "on screen" version.... both sorts now that I think about it, but both resulting in different interpretations being an extreme difference in "porn" and "movie romance." I will in no way say that such is wrong per say, only that in a real sense, how possible is it to actually achieve?
The fun of employing those presented fantasies is considerable... but in the modern atmosphere, seem to have become predominant.
It is that sort that usually leads to deceptions and sneaking around in the interest of preserving the "relationship" and "feelings" while fulfilling other "needs" that weren't met in the fantasy version of "love." And further weren't communicated much for the same reasons of a lack in comfort and familiarity which can easily be found in most standard, run of the mill friendships.
From my personal perspective, the most success would be found "through" embarrassing such aspects than in approaching "love" as if it were something to be coddled and danced around on eggshells.
Of course, that isn't conducive to so many topical things in society that it probably sounds absolutely insane in the context of which I am presenting it.
It even sounds as though a person would have to hasten the "honey moon" aspects to achieve it... but as crazy as I must be, I do not see this as the case unless "it" is approached exclusively from that angle of perceiving some finish line... some definite direction and layout even... when really, relationship in the literal sense means very much to "relate."
In many regards, the want of such relationships as are those postured to be exemplary in the eyes of society, actually even forsake the "honeymoon" aspect in posing as it, as if on display... ruining even the fun of such follies with "design" and expectation.
I suppose though that the element of danger in the modern society is definitely a factor. The risk of getting your heart ripped out when you really care about something - even to the tune of having removed all such barriers as expectations provide - is truly a considerable risk in the modern social atmosphere. In any situation and most especially in regard to personal human exchange in genuine interests.
Some within our society have even made it their version to simply forgo any actual interests, and get right to utilizing such potentials as a social weapon of sorts, as if there were some contest to win.
Perhaps, now that I think about it, the expectation of such potential as said familiarity may even be considered as "expectation" beyond the common want of those frivolous things which are constantly associated with the optimum relationship.
Where then does that leave us as cognitive creatures?
Probably incredibly screwed and forever lost within the manufactured and developed idea called "love" which probably was created as an effort to categorize all of those crazy human urges we are saddled with.... unless one happens to be entirely void of living aspects of humanity.....that make us want of said relationship(s) through various inspirations, including even a sense of control.
Some people subject themselves to various levels of manufactured insanity in order to hope of some sense of control! How incredibly magnificent is life from some perspectives! How could it get any better from certain, unique as per entertaining aspects in observation and appreciation?
To subject ones self to versions of insanity, in the interest of finding all that anyone really wants in so many instances!
Shakespeare, eat your heart out. It doesn't get much better in the dark humored appreciation of this grand comedy, than that!
If contracts were worth a shit in our modern day, I would perhaps suggest that they would be the better option to resolve the apparent impasse of humanity, called "love." Contractual agreements, hookers and gigolo's.
But that as well, would alienate most of the population not being able to afford them. So I guess we are just screwed.